Katja Pottschmidt, Peter Kretschmar, Ekaterina Sokolova-Lapa, Elena Ambrosi, Ralf Ballhausen, Peter A. Becker, Katrin Berger, McKinley C. Brumback, Joel B. Coley, Robin H. D. Corbet, Antonino D'Aì, Megan E. DeCesar, Carlo Ferrigno, Felix Fürst, Nazma Islam, Ingo Kreykenbohm, Vicente Madurga-Favieres, Pragati Pradhan, Jakob Stierhof, Philipp Thalhammer, Brent F. West, Michael T. Wolff, Aafia Zainab, Nicolas Zalot, Christian Malacaria, Richard E. Rothschild, Jörn Wilms, Kent S. Wood
Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph)Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE)+3
AI 摘要
非洲拥有深厚而多样的天文学知识传统,包括考古天文学、古埃及星辰计时、西非廷巴克图和萨赫勒地区的手稿天文学、南非的生态季节天文学以及埃塞俄比亚的历法计算等。这些传统组成了一个跨时代的知识史,与现代天文学交织在一起。本文利用Web of Science核心集的计量数据,分析了2000至2025年期间天文学与天体物理学领域的发表与引用模式,特别关注非洲学者的发表渠道。研究发现,尽管非洲研究者对全球天文学发现做出了积极贡献,但其知识主要通过位于非洲以外的出版系统存储、验证和传播,这反映了全球学术交流中的结构性不平等。本文通过解殖视角对引用影响力和知识所有权等指标进行批判性分析,并呼吁重新审视维持知识殖民性的学术实践。结论提出,实现科学公平需通过战略性出版转向,构建和强化主权性的非洲知识档案以改变现状。
Hongxing Chen (1), Sne{\vz}ana Stanimirovi{ć} (1), James Dempsey (2), Jacco Th. van Loon (3), Yik Ki Ma (4 and 2), Hiep Nguyen (2), Nickolas M. Pingel (5), John M. Dickey (6), Min-Young Lee (7 and 8), N. M. McClure-Griffiths (2 and 9), Claire E. Murray (10 and 11), Lister Staveley-Smith (12), Denis Leahy (13), Callum Lynn (2), Antoine Marchal (2, 14 and 15), Daniel R. Rybarczyk (1), Helga D{é}nes (16), Steven Gibson (17), Katherine Jameson (18), Ian Kemp (19), Ioana A. Stelea (1) ((1) Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA, (2) Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, (3) Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele University, Keele, UK, (4) Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Bonn, Germany, (5) Department of Astronomy, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA, (6) School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia, (7) Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, (8) Department of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, (9) SKA Observatory, Jodrell Bank, Macclesfield, UK, (10) Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, USA, (11) Department of Physics & Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA, (12) International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia, (13) Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, (14) Laboratoire de Physique de l'École Normale Supérieure, ENS, Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France, (15) LUX, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France, (16) College of Sciences and Engineering, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador, (17) Department of Physics and Astronomy, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, USA, (18) Caltech Owens Valley Radio Observatory, Pasadena, USA, (19) International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia)
许多现代机器学习模型(如高斯过程和神经切线核)可以被视为基于核的函数空间模型。在科学机器学习中,差分算子被越来越多地用于将物理结构直接编码到这些模型中。然而,这些构造是否是有效的机器学习模型(是否保持半正定性)一直不明确,且不稳定性是源于建模问题还是数值效应也未清晰。本研究提出了一个简单而充分的条件:对于阶数为 \( m \) 的线性差分算子,基础核必须具有 \( m \) 次连续可微性。此条件同样适用于具有非常数甚至不连续系数的算子。这一结论具有广泛适用性,例如扩散、材料弹性、非均匀介质中的波传播以及量子系统等物理系统的模型。此外,研究表明剩余的不稳定性主要是由数值问题导致的,为基于算子的核方法提供了统一的有效性基础。
R. Ruffini, Y. Aimuratov, L. M. Becerra, Chris L. Fryer, Liang Li, G. J. Mathews, M. T. Mirtorabi, R. Moradi, F. Rastegarnia, J. A. Rueda, C. Sigismondi, S. S. Xue, Yu Wang